This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I was asked about Digital Signatures for FHIRdocuments: I am working on __ IG that is FHIRdocument based and we need a means to prove authenticity. The model is relatively simple in that a document and all of its parts represent a single thing that needs to be “signed”. It is a document of type XML-Signature.
There’s a new report out that finds lots of security vulnerabilities in FHIR implementations, both client and server. Unforunately, the media write up isn’t entirely accurate: In fact, every tested FHIR app enabled API access to patient health data belonging to other individuals.
A couple of weekends ago, HL7 India held the inaugural FHIR Connectathon for India. India, btw, has a massive base of engineers who understand FHIR, since there’s so much outsourcing to India – India has always loomed large in the geo-resolution of hits on the FHIR test servers. Thanks Kumar and team!
I had an email from a company which had a number of really good questions about exposing data through FHIR, so I thought I’d write a post about it rather than just replying directly as it may be of interest to others (and also gives others the opportunity to disagree with me ). One resource that is not in the diagram above is the Encounter.
I already have one proposal for the transition from the current Federated Health Information Exchange to supporting FHIR, that is based on a transition from CDA to FHIR-Documents. Note that just because the content being published is a "Document" does not mean that it must be consumed as a document.
This profile shows how to build a Document Sharing Exchange using IHE profiled FHIR® standard, rather than the legacy IHE profiles that is dominated by XDS and HL7® v2. This profile will assemble profiles and define a Document Registry. The actor that is specific to this profile is a Document Registry. 3 - Section 4.0
It’s currently fed by HL7 version 2 messages and there’s a User Interface for authorized users, but there was always a plan to introduce a FHIR interface to some point – something that has been accelerated by the current COVID pandemic of course. So what would a FHIR API look like? This does seem a bit of a stretch though….
Documents have a bad perception, they are big, unfocused, and hard to process or view. I'm going to propose something that is counter to the perception, driven by current healthcare use of CDA documents and the HL7 Principles of a Document. When is a Document a Document? When is a Document a Document?
In the USA and elsewhere, there are Document Sharing based Health Information Exchanges. The solution is to leverage this existing solution, and just add FHIR. My point in this article is that this does not need to be a restriction on those that do want to move on to FHIR. Just add FHIRFHIR is a content format.
I outline in the last article that a Document Sharing "document" does not need to be a "Document". I propose that there might be a set of documents that are very focused on specific concepts, or Document sections. This is a real Document, but it is made up of sections that are interesting on their own.
He detailed how API users are facing onerous fees, incomplete documentation, and general difficulty connecting with providers. Another ASTP/ONC post found only 20% of HIE organizations are using HL7 FHIR APIs to send and receive data. About 90% still use a mix of CDAs, HL7 v2 messages, and ADT transfers.
The Mobile Health Document Sharing (MHDS) Profile is a 100% FHIRDocument Sharing infrastructure leveraging many IHE FHIR profiles including MHD. This Document Sharing includes support for sharing FHIR-Documents, but is content format agnostic, thus equally capable of sharing CDA documents, PDF documents, or imaging.
The subset of IHE profiles that leverage HL7®FHIR® Release 4. The remainder of the IHE profiles that leverage HL7® FHIR® are expected to be upgraded to FHIR® Release 4 later in 2019. IHE published the following updated supplements for trial implementation as of March 6, 2019 IHE Appendix Z on HL7® FHIR® - Rev.
In this set of posts we’re going to dig into how FHIR supports the use of forms in collecting information. . Forms are ubiquitous in healthcare (and other domains for that matter) so it makes sense that there is some specific support in FHIR for them. StructureMap is based on the FHIR Mapping language to perform the extraction.
In this video, President Jay Nakashima explains the role they play, particularly in public health, scaling FHIR and TEFCA. He is also looking forward to wider adoption of FHIR, which eHealth Exchange has been working with since 2017. It is still around and thriving as a non-profit.
Hyland is meeting providers where they are by using open standards like DICOM and FHIR, ensuring smooth integration without disrupting existing workflows. Examples from healthcare include X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, faxed documents, scanned paper forms, and clinical notes.
Security Report: " The New Healthcare Ecosystem will depend on FHIR APis, but Are They Secure? The point we should take from this research is that EHRs are doing a good job of securing their FHIR implementations FHIR is good and worthy There is room for improvement in some implementations There are included recommended improvements.
Webinar recording is available that covers the Document Sharing Health Information Exchange (HIE) on FHIR. This is available on the IHE YouTube channel The slide deck with embedded recording is in the IT-Infrastructure github repo The content for this presentation are baked into the IHE Mobile Health Documents Sharing (MHDS) profile.
It’s a common thing for implementers to want to do with FHIR: connect to a FHIR server, and make a local copy of the information provided by the server, and then check back occasionally with the server for updates – that is, new resources, or changes to existing resources. (In
The FHIR Standard doesn’t say much about security. There are, however, many different valid approaches to making a server secure, so the FHIR standard delegates making rules about security to other specifications such as the Smart App Launch Specification. A security appliance is not enough. openId Connect.
This article is where I muse about getting to that beautiful future based on #FHIR. Break Everything One possibly that some advocate is turn off what we have today, and everyone and everything switch to using http RESTful FHIR. This pair of transports now has a third FHIR mode, so Karen's Cross is now three dimensional.
I will be giving a face-to-face tutorial on the topic of "IHE on FHIR" at both HL7 Workgroup meeting in Cologne, May 12-18 FHIR Dev Days in Boston, June 19-21 So, if you are in Europe, sign up for the tutorial at HL7 workgroup meeting. If you are in the USA, sign up for the tutorial at FHIR Dev Days.
This will be the first post in a short series that considers a very useful interaction – accessing Laboratory data such as blood tests from a repository of data via (of course) a FHIR API. There are 2 core resources, and a number of supporting ones. This is often called a ‘panel’.
Most discussions about FHIR are simple interaction diagrams like this: Many Sources (n != We could imagine that EACH of these Sources will publish a FHIR endpoint and publish US-Core based Common Clinical Data Set (CCDS). But may be a set of discharge summary, or episode documents.
How does one put a FHIRDocument into XDS? How does one find a FHIRDocument in XDS? XDS, more broadly the whole Document Sharing family, including XDS , XCA , XDR , XDM , and MHD. Initially Document Sharing was about 'historic' documents. Thus the Document is "Shared". Let me explain.
The FDA also provides necessary guidelines for operating a device and supporting documents highlighting the dos, don’ts, and pros and cons, thus helping make informed decisions. Adopting FHIR standards for integrating data with a physician's daily workflow. Remote patient monitoring uses three primary FHIR resources: Patient.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) has been busy creating Profiles that leverage the new and exciting FHIR specification. IHE publishes their profiles on [link] IHE subset of Profile on FHIR can be found on the IHE wiki FHIR list An IHE Profile is equivalent to a FHIR Implementation Guide.
The IPS is a Document, and there is a definition for this document using CDA and using FHIR. The FHIRDocument is the one most are interested in. But FHIR is the hot new standard, so everyone wants to use it. But FHIR is the hot new standard, so everyone wants to use it.
At the recent Working Group Meeting in Montreal, I participated in the ‘v2 to FHIR’ stream – focused on how can the HL7 community give advice to implementers about converting v2 messages into FHIR bundles. To actually process (convert to FHIR) a message, click the ‘Convert’ button to the upper right.
Healthcare software vendors prioritize projects that use HL7 ® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR ® ) over those built on other standards for many reasons. Because FHIR resources have a defined structure, they can be accessed, manipulated, and exchanged in ways that other standards aren’t today.
As FHIR continues to mature, one of the things we’re seeing is a move away from ‘simple’ data representation Implementation Guides to more complex ones that describe a workflow of some sort. To test this out, I chose a simple use case that uses FHIR notifications to let relatives know when a person is admitted to hospital.
Today on the FHIR Consent call we had a very useful discussion of how one would use FHIR Consent to do the same thing that BPPC does in XDS. Said another way, what is the degenerate form of FHIR Consent that is equal-to the functionality of BPPC, and what is the degenerate form of FHIR Consent that is compatible with BPPC.
Document Sharing Across Network Topologies- Rev. The Document Sharing Across Network Topologies White Paper expands upon the concepts in the Health Information Exchange White Paper by providing additional guidance on how existing document sharing communities can be interconnected to form a unified federated exchange ecosystem.
The release of FHIR in the mid-2010 decade changed everything. The workflow is illustrated in a diagram in an article on the FHIR web site. The standardization of documentation for prior authorization also enables physicians to submit requests within their familiar electronic medical record systems, reducing the burden on providers.
Does that mean we don't move to nationwide http RESTful FHIR? I expect, as I have said before, that the green-fields will/should use http RESTful FHIR. I expect, as I have said before, that the green-fields will/should use http RESTful FHIR. The use of http RESTful FHIR at the edges or point-to-point make good sense.
An EHR system needs to make a 360-degree view of patient data accessible in a secure manner that can be made available using standard interfaces like FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) APIs for structured data exchange and DICOM for imaging.
Discussions at FHIR DevDays raised this question of a basic way to leverage FHIR API capability to enable the Patient beyond the limited Apps their provider has approved. If a healthcare provider offers a FHIR API (e.g. Concern would come up when this export of $everything includes other data such as documents and images.
Don Rucker, MD, chief strategy officer at 1upHealth , shows us in this video how current regulations and FHIR standards will actually make that happen. Watch the video for more details about pressures on Medicare Advantage plans, rules about prior authorization, FHIR APIs, and more.
There is a FHIR leadership desire to have the FHIR Data Type "Signature" normative in FHIR R6. The ballots leading to FHIR R6 will give us a chance to test with the community their interest in this Data Type being ready to be called Normative. The FHIR Signature Datatype is less concerning than all of Digital Signatures.
I think the most useful value-add that an HIE can add is an API that is based on FHIR. Initially I would focus on Document sized objects, Later moving to more element level. Documents There has been much focus lately on the publication side of Document Sharing. Why Documents? Especially if the data is historic.
I did a demo of clinFHIR for the Clinicians on FHIR group that will be meeting at the Working Group Meeting next week, and completely forgot to talk about creating/viewing documents in clinFHIR using the scenario builder. Note the Document tab in the middle pane (next to the Graph). More on that to come.
So a little while back I wrote about an app I developed during the WGM Connectathon to send an HL7 v2 message to a converter app, and display the response (a FHIR Bundle ) in a number of visualizations after validating it using the community supplied validation tool (actually, exposed by the reference servers via the $validate operation).
Updates that require support for FHIR-based APIs should allow TEFCA participants to more easily exchange information directly, and enable individuals to more easily access their own information. Products Augmedix launched Augmedix Go , ambient AI medical documentation for the ED, and announced HCA Healthcare as a pilot user.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 48,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content