This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
RPA is a great example of health technology in the unvendor environment. This is a great example of the power of un-vendoring, Harm asserts. RPA is but one of many examples Harm pointed to: one of the areas that strongly resonated with me was population health, which is not easily managed through the single-vendor EHR.
Could be FHIR resources, but more likely a database structure specific to the needs of the lab domain. And, conceivably doing more than just storing data – for example it could be tracking that the results have been viewed by the ordering clinician. FHIR Operation? Above them all is a Terminology Server.
The organizations created a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources ( FHIR ) -based implementation leveraging the existing eHealth Exchange infrastructure as the central network to send and receive FHIR messages about adverse events.
It’s currently fed by HL7 version 2 messages and there’s a User Interface for authorized users, but there was always a plan to introduce a FHIR interface to some point – something that has been accelerated by the current COVID pandemic of course. So what would a FHIR API look like?
I was asked about Digital Signatures for FHIR documents: I am working on __ IG that is FHIR document based and we need a means to prove authenticity. I have looked around for examples of this in IGs and in example documents and I have not found anything. Are there exampleFHIR IGs and documents out there.
In this set of posts we’re going to dig into how FHIR supports the use of forms in collecting information. . Forms are ubiquitous in healthcare (and other domains for that matter) so it makes sense that there is some specific support in FHIR for them. StructureMap is based on the FHIR Mapping language to perform the extraction.
I also added this to the ci-build at [link] , so it will be present for all future versions of FHIR. Example: These spreadsheets are to help people who want to do spreadsheet based mapping, as a starting point. . Alternatives: the FHIR Mapping Language MDMI (and see MDHT ) Writing your own code…
This will be the first post in a short series that considers a very useful interaction – accessing Laboratory data such as blood tests from a repository of data via (of course) a FHIR API. There are 2 core resources, and a number of supporting ones. This graph also contains a number of the supporting resources.
It’s a common thing for implementers to want to do with FHIR: connect to a FHIR server, and make a local copy of the information provided by the server, and then check back occasionally with the server for updates – that is, new resources, or changes to existing resources. (In And that’s a real problem.
On a forum for FHIR Foundation members, I raised the subject of where FHIR is on the Gartner Hype Cycle (see Gartner write up , or Wikipedia ). FHIR Foundation member Wes Rishel ( @wrishel ), who’s a FHIR user, and also was a Gartner Analyst before he retired, graciously made this contribution that I could post here.
The FHIR Standard doesn’t say much about security. There are, however, many different valid approaches to making a server secure, so the FHIR standard delegates making rules about security to other specifications such as the Smart App Launch Specification. A security appliance is not enough. openId Connect.
I had an email from a company which had a number of really good questions about exposing data through FHIR, so I thought I’d write a post about it rather than just replying directly as it may be of interest to others (and also gives others the opportunity to disagree with me ). One resource that is not in the diagram above is the Encounter.
This article includes explanation of some example scenarios and points at example Consent resources for them. These example scenarios are provided for educational use only, they are not an endorsement of these scenarios. example Given: the same example attributes as above with the addition of a signed form.
For example, if we just wanted the recommendation for a new born then it’s quite easy. For example, the DTaP-IPV-HepB/Hib vaccine is given 3 times – at 6 weeks (dose 1), 3 months (dose 2) and 5 months (dose 3). Looking at the proposal for the next version of FHIR (R5) it is multiple, but we can’t use that yet.
Each of the teams with whom we collaborated did a stellar job with their pitch desks, business model articulation, and deployment of the latest technology – for example, chatbots working toward mental health and FHIR standards toward interoperability.
As FHIR continues to mature, one of the things we’re seeing is a move away from ‘simple’ data representation Implementation Guides to more complex ones that describe a workflow of some sort. Compare, for example the Argonaut data query Implementation Guide with the Argonaut scheduling guide currently in development.
At the recent Working Group Meeting in Montreal, I participated in the ‘v2 to FHIR’ stream – focused on how can the HL7 community give advice to implementers about converting v2 messages into FHIR bundles. To actually process (convert to FHIR) a message, click the ‘Convert’ button to the upper right.
Hyland is meeting providers where they are by using open standards like DICOM and FHIR, ensuring smooth integration without disrupting existing workflows. Examples from healthcare include X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, faxed documents, scanned paper forms, and clinical notes.
In a number of contexts, people are using FHIR in production to make or report on patient appointments. How to represent this in FHIR: Mark an appointment as a virtual appointment. Examples include telephone conference, email exchange, robotic surgery, and televideo conference. it) has co-morbidities that are known risk factors.
For example, cardiology requires more digital monitoring devices than other specialties to monitor BP, weight, heart rate, and EKGs in real-time. Adopting FHIR standards for integrating data with a physician's daily workflow. Remote patient monitoring uses three primary FHIR resources: Patient.
Question: Is there a URI form for specifying FHIR versions? For example, ‘ r4.fhir.hl7.org For example, an external system that may not only interact with FHIR servers would need to use that URI to determine that: a) the server to invoke is a FHIR one; and, b) the version is r4.
I was trying to remember how to represent family relationships in FHIR – to record that one person is related to another, maybe a mother / daughter relationship, assuming that each person is already represented by a Patient resource. The Patient.link then has a type of ‘seealso’ to the Related person. Install sushi.
The 23 rd FHIR connectathon in Sydney is almost upon us, and despite the trials and tribulations that the weather has thrown at us, it’s going to be a great event with over 150 people currently scheduled to attend. For myself, I’m going to participate in the FHIR shorthand track. In keeping with the FHIR ethos, the Mitre corp.
2023 HL7 ® FHIR ® DevDays in Amsterdam stood out in a few ways, and in case you weren’t able to make it to the event, here’s your chance to digest the newly uploaded session recordings. These sessions highlighted two crucial truths about FHIR capabilities and adoption. In the meantime, check out our latest FHIR content below.
Healthcare software vendors prioritize projects that use HL7 ® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR ® ) over those built on other standards for many reasons. Because FHIR resources have a defined structure, they can be accessed, manipulated, and exchanged in ways that other standards aren’t today.
So a little while back I wrote about an app I developed during the WGM Connectathon to send an HL7 v2 message to a converter app, and display the response (a FHIR Bundle ) in a number of visualizations after validating it using the community supplied validation tool (actually, exposed by the reference servers via the $validate operation).
There is a FHIR leadership desire to have the FHIR Data Type "Signature" normative in FHIR R6. The ballots leading to FHIR R6 will give us a chance to test with the community their interest in this Data Type being ready to be called Normative. The FHIR Signature Datatype is less concerning than all of Digital Signatures.
So I’ve written an earlier post describing how you can use the excellent HAPI FHIR engine to host your own FHIR server. This used the CLI (Command Line Interface) tool , and has worked well for me in the past – for example most of the clinFHIR modules have used this as the back end storage.
As you probably know, there are a number of ‘conformance’ resources in FHIR that have a unique ‘canonical’ Url that identifies them globally. So how do you accomplish this across different versions of FHIR? So back to FHIR versions. Take an example of a ValueSet – say the set of iwi in New Zealand.
We spent a bit of time in the last post describing why we want to have data coded, how FHIR supports coded data – especially the external terminologies where the concepts are defined – and described some of the RESTful API calls that we could make to retrieve specific Observations and DiagnosticReports from the repository.
Users are grouped into "clearances" (aka roles); this might be a FHIR PractitionerRole, CareTeam, RelatedPerson, and Group; but might be something non-FHIR (aka OAuth, LDAP, etc). A good example is Observation.category code of 'vital-signs' -- indicates vital signs that are normal health information of no stigmatizing sensitivity.
You might, for example, want to reference the ServiceRequest from the Specimen – and indicate who actually took the specimen. This is actually a good example how a single ValueSet can refer to concepts from multiple CodeSystems. And, of course, you could document this in an Implementation Guide with the appropriate profiles.
The FHIR R4 ballot is out (see announcement), and I’d like to draw attention to one part of FHIR that we’ve been working hard on during the preparation of R4: Patterns. h/t to Andrew Goodchild for introducing me to this example many years ago). In FHIR, we made a specific decision to be as specific as we can get away with.
In the first post, I covered how Redox is overcoming current limitations with bulk FHIR. This time, I’ll be discussing our capabilities to translate between HL7 ® v2 and HL7 ® FHIR ® —a reoccurring challenge for many of our customers. However, modern technology shops want everything in FHIR. Let’s dive in. What does HL7 v2 do?
IHE IT-Infrastructure has agreed to start a new work item on the topic of Privacy Consent, using FHIR. This minimally would be a re-evaluation of the use-cases in BPPC for use with FHIR Consent, but likely will go beyond that scope simply because of modern needs, modern toolings, and ease at which the FHIR Consent can support them.
An EHR system needs to make a 360-degree view of patient data accessible in a secure manner that can be made available using standard interfaces like FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) APIs for structured data exchange and DICOM for imaging.
Up first: Using bulk FHIR. What is bulk FHIR? Like many aspects of HL7 ® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR ® ), there has been a lot of hype about the potential of using bulk FHIR to get large amounts of data out of EHRs. That’s where bulk FHIR comes in.
For example, "I've been nauseous today, I have a headache, my headaches are getting worse." Artificial intelligence has really come a long way in the last 10 years from companies like Uber and Tesla for example, and you're seeing the proof points of its value. This made the integration process very slow and expensive.
This conversion enabled better and more comprehensive definition of the Provenance linkage between the derived FHIR clinical Resources and the source documents from the HIE. This Provenance definition is now in mXDE along with examples and requirements CapabilityStatement.
In discussions with implementers, one question that has come up quite a lot recently is whether you should store FHIR resources natively in your database or not. In principle, FHIR resources (like all HL7 specifications) are designed for exchange between systems, rather than as a database storage format.
Examples are probably one of the more useful things to an implementer – yet likely the least exciting part of building an Implementation Guide (IG) to the designer. But the tooling to create examples is not that great. Admittedly it does require a basic understanding of FHIR – but well within the reach of a Clinician or BA.
Microsoft took a step to address health data interoperability with Azure API for FHIR in 2019. For example, a patient whose lack of transportation makes it difficult to get to their appointment on time could use Patient Virtual Care to connect with their physician virtually. More holistic view of the patient.
Last week a handful of Redoxers headed over the big pond to take in 2023 HL7 FHIR DevDays. We loved connecting and reconnecting with the world’s foremost FHIR enthusiasts in Amsterdam. For example, there is healthy demand to implement FHIR-based queries (e.g., FHIR’s promise as a programable standard is being delivered.
Before we start thinking of the specifics of coding in lab tests, a quick review of coded data in FHIR in general is probably a good idea. The strength of the binding is ‘example’, which means that, actually, any code from any codesystem is allowed. For example, a url value of [link] would indicate that this is a LOINC code.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 48,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content